Kirjaudu ▼
 

Egyptin rauha järkkyi yön iskuissa

AMR ABDALLAH DALSH
Egyptin rauha järkkyi yön iskuissa
Egyptin turvallisuusjoukkojen iskuissa on kuollut yöllä 20 islamistikapinallista. Asiasta kertoi uutistoimisto Reuters.
Reuters-Taloussanomat
8.8.2012 07:32
13

– Iskimme al-Toumahin alueen kapinallisia vastaan. Tuhosimme kolme terroristien aseistettua autoa. Hyökkäyksessä kuoli 20 terroristia, Reutersin haastattelema komentaja vahvistaa.

turvallisuusjoukkojen iskut tapahtuivat sen jälkeen, kun islamistiset asemiehet olivat iskeneet raja-asemalle myöhään sunnuntai-iltana Egyptissä. 16 rajavartijaa kuoli tulituksessa. 

∇ Mainos ∇
Lisää suosikkeihin

Henkilökohtaiselle suosikkilistalle tallentaminen vaatii kirjautumista.

KirjauduRekisteröidy

Kommentit (13)

Sivut: 1 2
EdellinenSeuraava

Anonyymi
www.strategic-culture.org/pview/2012/05/28/a-soros-made-new-world-order-takes-shape-at-the-un.html
Herätkää 8.8.2012 8:00

Anonyymi
Demokratian vienti Egyption siis onnistui. Heh.

Rättipääkulttuuri vaatii johtajaksi diktaattorin. Muuten tulee kaaos.

Kukkahatuille tiedoksi.
Jussuf Hallah-Akbad 8.8.2012 8:10

Anonyymi
Recent developments in Mali illustrate both the way in which the Unites States and its Western allies directly project military and political power, as well as the role of terrorism as a necessary pretext for imperialist, neo-colonial domination. Beginning with the establishment of AFRICOM (US Africa Command) in 2007, incorporating the war in Libya and the military coup d?etat in Mali, and up to today?s consolidation of power by Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), it has become clear that the United States has managed to successfully destabilize West Africa and achieve many of its long-term strategic objectives in the region.

While the Western media portrays the situation in West Africa as an ?unintended consequence? of the imperialist aggression against Libya, the incontrovertible fact that the United States has, for years, attempted to expand its control of the region, has been made all the more apparent by the current instability and the ?decisive action? that it necessitates. The spread of AQIM, which has now consolidated control over a vast swath of land in the Sahel region, rather conveniently provides the US with the crucial cover it needs to expand its military presence.


Recent Developments

Since the fall of the Gaddafi regime in Libya, Mali has been embroiled in a fierce civil war that has torn the country apart. The Tuareg fighters, who had fought on the side of Gaddafi and the Green Resistance, began to return home armed, battle-hardened, and bearing a grudge. This was, understandably, a recipe for war in Mali where the central government was seen as little more than a US puppet regime, touting democracy as it bowed to US military and corporate interests. The rebels began waging war against Bamako in hopes of creating their own independent state of Azawad in Northern Mali, a goal which has been stifled since Mali gained its own independence in 1960.

As the war continued to intensify, the Malian military became increasingly frustrated with what they perceived to be a lack of support from the civilian government. This anger and resentment was then channeled by a small clique within the Malian officer corps into a coup d?etat to overthrow the government in Bamako. The coup was lead by Captain Amadou Sanogo, a US-trained mid-level officer, heading an assortment of lower-level military officers who claimed to be patriots seeking to quell the rebellion in the North. In reality, the move was a cynically designed ploy by Sanogo and his US sponsors to destabilize Mali. As anticipated, the overthrow plunged the country into political turmoil, and with no legitimate government in the capital, opened the door to a much more dangerous enemy in the North.


Enter: Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb

In the midst of the fighting between the Touré government and the Tuareg forces, there emerged a new threat in the North, Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). This offshoot of Al Qaeda, once seen as a marginal threat with little to no chance of establishing a significant presence in the region, began to make its presence felt through an alliance with the rebels. Really no more than a marriage of convenience, the two forces fought side by side to defeat the weak Malian military which, despite years of training and advanced equipment from the United States, was unable to inflict any significant damage on the rebels or terrorist fighters. However, once it became clear that the North was going to be ?freed? from the control of the government and Malian military, the divide between rebels and AQ fighters became evident.

Eyewitness accounts from Mali describe the AQIM fighters as having arrived in Land Cruisers with advanced weapons and communications equipment, ostensibly acquired through defeating the Malian and other military forces in the region. This highly organized and well-funded contingent emerged in Mali after having been roundly defeated by the military and other government forces in Algeria, where the group originated. This fact should not be lost on keen observers who note that, due to their failure to destabilize that oil-rich country in the interests of Western imperialists, AQIM migrated to Mali where they successfully hijacked the civil war there and turned it into another staging ground for terror and destabilization, like its corollary in Libya.


AQIM, US-AFRICOM, and the Destabilization of the Sahel

As with other Al Qaeda offshoots, AQIM?s history is directly related to that of the US intelligence and military presence in the Sahel. The US military?s Africa Command (AFRICOM) was established by the Bush Administration in 2007 in order to, in their words, ?defend US national security interests by strengthening the defense capabilities of African States?and defeat transnational threats.? However, within months of the establishment of AFRICOM, the Algerian group known as the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat (SGPC) was rebranded AQIM and immediately became a much more serious threat with international capabilities, something it had never had before that point.

One can only wonder how, within the span of a few short months, as US military and intelligence presence is dramatically increased, such a group can immediately spring up. It would be logical to assume that the two events are not merely coincidence. Rather, AFRICOM, in order to legitimize its own presence in the region needed an enemy. So, it took an obscure terror organization, gave them the Al Qaeda banner, and thereby created the conditions for a military presence. AFRICOM was then able to install so-called ?advisers? in the militaries of the region, ostensibly to combat the threat posed by this new organization while, in truth, creating dependence of those militaries on the United States. These developments were part of the broader mission known as the Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership which enabled the United States to penetrate the militaries of the entire region and thereby make them into clients or proxies of the US military. It is precisely this dependence which was so evident in the routing of the Malian military at the hands of the rebels and AQIM.

With the defeat of the Malian forces and the de facto establishment of the state of Azawad, AQIM now controls a large portion of the Sahel/West Africa region, allowing it to menace neighboring states and continue to legitimize the AFRICOM presence. This military presence, though, is not entirely visible. In fact, it is now confirmed that US commandos and other Special Forces have been actively engaged in Mali since before the coup in late March. According to mainstream media and military spokespeople, the commandos were purely communications experts providing technical assistance to the military. While this is undoubtedly true to a certain extent, the news indicates a much broader engagement in the country, one that likely includes all manner of covert operations engaging with terrorists, rebels, and the military forces. Essentially then, the situation in Mali, and the wider region, has to be understood as being directly and cynically manipulated by the United States.


US Objectives

The US imperialist ruling class has a multitude of reasons for their desire to destabilize the Sahel and Africa more broadly. First and foremost is the desire to block the continued Chinese economic penetration of the continent. It is no secret that China has become, by far, the most significant investor in Africa. With the mutually beneficial arrangements wherein China engages in large-scale economic development while receiving, in return, access to raw materials, the Chinese have entrenched themselves in many African nations. Because of this, the United States must find ways to slow down or stop altogether these relations by any means necessary.

Secondly, the US seeks to prevent the independent economic development of Africa. Washington and Wall St. cannot bear to watch their former servants establish themselves outside of US dollar hegemony. As the US, Europe, and much of the world have slipped into a global depression, much of Africa has remained economically stable. Naturally, the 1% cannot allow this, and so, they must seek to re-impose their dominance utilizing the usual assortment of weapons: terrorism, military coups, and blackmail. In so doing, Africa is once again under the thumb of Western financiers.

Lastly, the US must do whatever it takes to continue to justify its military presence on the continent. Despite public revulsion throughout Africa to the idea of AFRICOM, Washington has managed to incorporate it into many of the militaries on the continent. In so doing, the US both legitimizes its own expenditures and is able to enforce the agenda of Wall St. and the international financier class. Moreover, this provides the muscle behind US puppet regimes such as those in Ethiopia, Rwanda, Uganda, and elsewhere - governments that act as the brutal enforcers of US policy, always bowing to the dictates of their patrons in Washington.


In many ways, Mali has become a second Libya - a fractured nation that has been reduced to chaos with much of the population living under the rule of terrorists and extremists. Like Libya, Mali is undoubtedly being transformed into a sanctuary for international terror campaigns that have, as their mission, nothing less than the total destruction of modern Africa. Whether conscious or unconscious, these forces, which seek to impose their will on the people of Africa, work in the service of the United States. As with Libya, Somalia, Nigeria, and countless other nations, the US imperialists, using the brutal weapon of terrorism, have reduced Mali to a failed state in order to consolidate their own domination and further their neo-colonial agenda.
Nimetön 8.8.2012 8:28

Anonyymi
Aina kun ählämsähläm tappavat toisiaan, oloni rauhoittuu.
Siperia, Polsoi, Tro 8.8.2012 8:33

Anonyymi
Egyptin vapaustaistelijat ammuttiin eikä USA ja YK puutu asiaan.
Nimetön 8.8.2012 9:09

Anonyymi
mieluimmin juuri noinpäin ja tarpeeksi ajoissa-emmekä tarvitse niitä "turvaan" tännekään.
yksikinislamisti on likaa sillä -islam on syöpä ,joka lähettää etäpesäkkeitä kaikkialle maailmaan
---miten syöpä leviää kehossa-sillä kun vasr´tustuskyky heikkenee tai se lamaannutettaan,,,esim suvaitsevaisuuden nimen alla kulkevalla synnillä.
huuko mäntti 8.8.2012 9:35

Anonyymi
mieluimmin juuri noinpäin ja tarpeeksi ajoissa-emmekä tarvitse niitä "turvaan" tännekään.yksikinislamisti on likaa sillä -islam on syöpä ,joka lähettää etäpesäkkeitä kaikkialle maailmaan---miten syöpä leviää kehossa-sillä kun vasr´tustuskyky heikkenee tai se lamaannutettaan,,,esim suvaitsevaisuuden nimen alla kulkevalla synnillä.


V*ttu, mitä idiootteja täällä elää.
Nimetön 8.8.2012 11:20

Anonyymi
Syria: The Next Casualty of Propaganda War

The use of rape and torture lies for propaganda purposes serve a very specific function: they create a climate conducive to war-making when a government has successfully resisted all other attempts at subversion and destabilization. Like the Gaddafi government last year, Assad?s government has managed to stay in power in the face of a multi-faceted, international war being waged against it from all sides. Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton, and the rest of the Washington imperialist warmongers are incensed that Assad has not yet fallen and that their terrorist proxies have been unequivocal failures. So, they turn to their most effective weapon: lies. As we?ve seen in recent days with the Houla massacre, the Western media, as a mouthpiece for US-NATO propaganda, has launched an all-out media campaign of lies to convince the public that Assad is a heartless, inhuman butcher. The claims that Syrian military forces were responsible for the horrendous massacre have been refuted and debunked countless times, so much so that even the Western media has had to recast the narrative, constantly changing it in the face of evidence to the contrary.

Whatever claims of rape and torture that might be true are likely being committed at the hands of the armed terrorist ?opposition? in Syria. If we are to believe that there actually are eyewitnesses to these acts, as claimed in the above mentioned London Telegraph article, then it is clear these acts are being carried out by these militias who have no connection to the Syrian government or to the Syrian people and are part of the international subversion campaign. These death squads, like their antecedents in Central America and Iraq, are trained by the West and its proxies in the Middle East because the imperialists know that they cannot otherwise execute their agenda.

It is necessary and, in fact, essential for the United States and its allies to wage this propaganda war. Without it, rationality and sound political thinking might sway public opinion away from war and back to the idea that Syria belongs to Syrians. This basic conception completely derails the entire drive for war, preventing Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, and the United States from imposing their will on the people of Syria and continuing their imperialist domination of the region.
Nimetön 8.8.2012 11:27

Anonyymi
Ai ne olikin muslimeja. No voi voi mites meidän puna-vihreä muslimiliittouma tästä sanoo ??

kyl tää jotenkin pitää saada kaadettua Israelin ja USA:n niskaan.
Totuus tuli ilmi 8.8.2012 11:42

Anonyymi
Ai ne olikin muslimeja. No voi voi mites meidän puna-vihreä muslimiliittouma tästä sanoo ??kyl tää jotenkin pitää saada kaadettua Israelin ja USA:n niskaan.


Lue tuo yläpuolinen (Syria: The Next Casualty of Propaganda War)kirjoitus, niin ehkä ymmärryksesi kasvaa. Tavuviivat valitettavasti puuttuvat.
Nimetön 8.8.2012 12:10
Sivut: 1 2
EdellinenSeuraava
Ohjeet: Pysy aiheessa ja kirjoita napakasti. Muista, että haastateltavilla, kanssakeskustelijoilla ja toimittajilla on oikeus omaan, eriävään mielipiteeseen. Ole kohtelias, äläkä tarkoituksella provosoi tai hauku muita keskustelijoita. Taloussanomat varaa oikeuden poistaa asiattomat viestit.
Lue koko keskusteluetiketti
Varaa oma nimimerkkisi Taloussanomien uutiskommentointiin rekisteröitymällä käyttäjäksi tai kirjaudu sisään.

Rekisteröityminen ja nimimerkin varaus eivät ole pakollisia.

Nimimerkissä saa käyttää ainoastaan kirjaimia ja numeroita. Sen minimimitta on viisi merkkiä ja maksimi kaksikymmentä merkkiä.
Olet kirjautunut sisään, muttet ole vielä valinnut omaa, muille käyttäjille näkyvää nimimerkkiäsi. Varaa nimimerkki omaksesi kirjoittamalla se nimimerkki-kenttään.

Varauksen jälkeen muut eivät voi käyttää nimimerkkiäsi ja se näkyy automaattisesti kaikissa kirjoittamissasi viesteissä.

Huomioithan, ettei nimimerkkiä ei voi muuttaa jälkikäteen.

Nimimerkissä saa käyttää ainoastaan kirjaimia ja numeroita. Sen minimimitta on viisi merkkiä ja maksimi kaksikymmentä merkkiä.
Asiakastieto

Yhteistyössä